Al Gore Has Become Irelevent

On February 28, 2010, in Global Warming, by Henshaw

It was only a matter of time before Al Gore climbed out of his hole. Gore has an op-ed today in the New York Times and he’s still beating the dead horse he’s been riding for decades. The Vice President who cried wolf has been warning us for decades about global warming. Nothing alarming has happened to the climate in that time except the coverage of the climate. Anyway, it appears Gore has changed his talking points on climategate since his last ill-informed statement back in December

Unfortunately, the reality of the danger we are courting has not been changed by the discovery of at least two mistakes in the thousands of pages of careful scientific work over the last 22 years by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The careful scientific work by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change? The sheer fact that the IPCC exists is an example of “governmental bias.” Is it really shocking that an entire panel created to study climate change found climate change? When “big oil” funds a scientific study the results are ignored by the alarmists. Alarmists have kindly ignored the big bucks being made thanks to climate change. For the past decade the climage change business has been booming. Al Gore has a financial stake in climate change and the mastermind of the 2007 IPCC report Dr Rajendra Pachauri is making money as well.

It was in this newspaper that we first revealed how Pachauri has earned millions of pounds for his Delhi-based research institute Teri, and further details are still emerging of how he has parlayed his position into a worldwide business empire, including 17 lucrative contracts from the EU alone. But we should not expect the truth to break in too suddenly on this mass of vested interests. Too many people have too much at stake to allow the faith in man-made global warming, which has sustained them so long and which is today making so many of them rich, to be abandoned.

The truth is finally starting to come on this sad tale. Al Gore has always been a political opportunist. Gore’s name on the Nobel Peace Prize disgraced the award long before Obama made it official. Gore’s Oscar for An Inconvenient Truth may go down in history as one of Hollywood’s most ignorant moments of all time (that’s saying something). In a way this is the worst thing that ever could happen to Gore. Losing the election was painful, but Gore has always cared deeply about what others think of him. As the fraud and bad science add up on the theory of man-made global so does the ridicule for Al Gore.

Gore is now remembered for two things he invented. Everyone knows Al Gore didn’t event the internet, but for many Gore is the face of the Global Warming swindle. Maybe I’m wrong. I’ve been wrong about Al Gore before, but something tells me the gig is up.

Avatar vs. Pocahontas

On February 27, 2010, in Miscellaneous, by Henshaw

I saw the movie Avatar back in December. From a visual standpoint the movie was amazing. It was definitely worth seeing at the theater in 3D; however, over time I expect the film to be forgotten. Why is that? Well, the story is completely unoriginal. One could even say that Avatar is Pocahontas in space. Vimeo has taken the trailers from Pocahontas and Avatar and mashed them together. The end result is amazing.

Inevitably there’s going to be a sequel to Avatar and I’m looking forward to it. It should push James Cameron to come up with something memorable.

Tagged with:
 

The Price of Change

On February 27, 2010, in Politics, by Henshaw

The Obama administration has been a godsend for unions. The Economist has an article about unions that sheds light on the type of job creation Obama intends to inflict on the nation. Obama and his socialist union allies would like to create 4 million union jobs. Why not? More union members equals more democrat voters? Why should Americans care? Well, unions cost more, do less, and do it worse than the private sector.

His [Obama] biggest favour has been green, foldable and borrowed. For example, he encourages the use of “Project Labour Agreements” on big federal construction projects, whereby contractors must recruit through a union hiring hall. Such agreements inflate costs by 12-18%, according to David Tuerck of Suffolk University, and were banned under Mr Bush. Even where PLAs are not in force, federal contractors are obliged to pay “prevailing” wages. That actually means something close to the union rates, which is nice for the workers in question but means that taxpayers get fewer roads and schools for their money.

Do prices even matter the way Obama is spending money? Unions are certainly less influential in the U.S. than in Europe. That’s a good thing; however, more than half of union members currently work for the government. Is it really surprising that unions support the party of state control? Is it surprising that Mr. Transparency is scratching the back of the Democrat voting bloc?

Increasing the strength and numbers of unions is not a good idea. Look at the problems in Greece. Look at the how the teachers unions in the United States are damaging eduction. There’s a growing movement among the crazy anti-Walmart crowd to unionize the place. Such a move would simply bleed the company dry and another company would take its place. I guess as long as Target and IKEA aren’t effected no one will mind.

Tagged with:
 

RE: Gerrymandered Census

On February 26, 2010, in Politics, by Henshaw

I mentioned House Rep. Mel Watt last week in my post about the Gerrymandered Census. As I stated before Watt is one of the most liberal members of the Congress and the only way he continues to get elected is because of gerrymandered districts.

The National Journal has posted the top 10 most liberal and conservative members of the Congress. It’s no surprise that Watt is tied for first. Is Watt really representing the average voter in the state of North Carolina?

The 10 Most Liberal House Dems    
1. Rush Holt (D-NJ)
1. Gwen Moore (D-WI)
1. John Olver (D-MA)
1. Linda Sanchez (D-CA)
1. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL)
1. Louise Slaughter (D-NY)
1. Mel Watt (D-NC)
1. Henry Waxman (D-CA)
9. Kathy Castor (D-FL)
10. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-IL)

Climate Change Program Manager

On February 26, 2010, in Global Warming, Politics, by Henshaw

The job market is difficult these days, but it’s not a bad time to look for government jobs. While companies lay off employees left and right the government only adds and keeps jobs. Great, right? Club Soda forwarded me this job for the National Park Service. The position is for a Climate Change Program Manager.

The Climate Change Program Manager provides overall leadership and management of National Park Service responsibilities, policies, and interests in climate change programs in within the National Park System. The Climate Change office coordinates acquisition and application of broad-based scientific and planning expertise and technologies to support climate change and associated programs.

This job pays between $103,000 to $155,000 per year. Does this sound like a position that is useful? I won’t even go into the whole tired climate change nonsense. The National Park Service has been one of the most poorly run departments in the United States. It’s a shame because 50 years ago it was one of the best departments. Thanks to a growing bureaucracy full of clueless do-gooders it has become a terrible waste of taxpayer dollars.

The Department of the Interior needs to be downsized and broken into smaller departments. Smaller groups are more effective at allocating resources. When a bloated bureaucracy gets involved useless positions like a Climate Change Program Manager are invented to push a political agenda. The amount of wasted money in these government departments is staggering.

Ron Paul Craziness

On February 25, 2010, in Politics, by Henshaw

The Federal Reserve is a very secretive organization. Most Americans don’t even realize that it’s not part of the federal government. I’m all for auditing the Federal Reserve to see where our money is going. If for anything, just to end these kind of weird conspiracy theories being thrown around by people like Ron Paul.

The Fed loaned money to Iraq in the 1980s? I guess that’s not outside the realm of possibility, but Watergate? At the end listen to the idiot Barney Frank. I don’t think he understands the Federal Reserve. If the Fed was involved in those crazy allegations it wouldn’t have been because of Nixon or Reagan. The Federal Reserve works outside of the government.

Tagged with:
 

Remove Clarence Thomas from History?

On February 24, 2010, in Politics, by Henshaw

The blog The Root, which is owned by The Washington Post, has an article entitled “Black Folks We’d Like To Remove From Black History.” The list includes Ugandan military dictator Idi Amin, the notorious “DC Sniper” John Allen Muhammad, and Zimbabwean totalitarian Robert Mugabe. Guess who else is on the list? That horrible man Clarence Thomas.

Although he’s only the second man of color to serve in the Supreme Court, the Backstreet Boys have more standing in the black community than Clarence Thomas. That’s because he looks to the Constitution as “colorblind,” says he’s a man who just happens to be black and opposes government programs intended to help minorities. I’m not sure if the late Thurgood Marshall would want to pop Clarence ‘side his head with his gavel, but there are plenty of blacks who would volunteer to do it for him.

Basically what Michael Arceneaux is saying is that Clarence Thomas’ responsibility isn’t to the Constitution, but to help minorities keep quotas that are unconstitutional. All citizens of the United States are supposed to be judged equally. This is why quotas are unconstitutional. Arceneaux should note that Thomas’ views on abortion and gay marriage actually are in line with most African Americans. However, if you’re an African American intellectual who disagrees with Arceneauex you’re in line with murderers. How’s that for derangement?

The true greatness of people like Clarence Thomas and the economist Thomas Sowell is that they are truly colorblind. Instead of grasping onto tired ideologies that are based on race they are able to think for themselves. Thomas Sowell is one of my favorite economists and he’s also someone who has changed the way I think about many issues. Should I care if he’s black, blue or purple? Apparently I should, at least according to Arceneaux. But I won’t.

MoveOn.org’s Bizzaro Reality

On February 23, 2010, in Politics, by Henshaw

Remember the health care public option ad? I do, it basically turned the American people against ObamaCare. Club Soda wrote about this ad a few months ago. Well, the socialists at MoveOn.org haven’t moved on, they still believe Americans want the public option and they’ve updated the video.

Just so no one is confused the “evil insurance companies” have endorsed ObamaCare. They love the plan because it forces people to get insurance at higher premiums. If you’re an insurance company it doesn’t get any better than that.

While there’s still a possibility that the Senate bill can be passed through reconciliation there’s no way the public option is on the table. Time to take a reality pill MoveOn.org.

Men Without Jobs

On February 23, 2010, in Politics, by Henshaw

Come January 2011 it’s increasingly likely that Majority Leader Senator Harry Reid will no longer be employed. That makes the video below all the more strange.

Is this a justification for the jobs bill or a cry for help? It’s a fairly strong indication that the bill being debated in Congress is worthless when abuse is used for justification. All this time I thought we could blame domestic abuse on the Jews living in Israel

Tagged with:
 

RE: Reconciliation or Suicide?

On February 22, 2010, in Politics, by Henshaw

It appears that the White House is ready to double down on dumb. While President Obama wants any kind of health care bill to sign I’m not sure he has the votes. 18 Democrats in the Senate are on the record saying they’re opposed to reconciliation, but politicians hardly ever keep their word. The big question is will the House pass the Senate version of the bill? I’m just not sure.

Meanwhile, the President’s approval ratings are continuing to sink. Now that he wants to ram through a very unpopular bill using a rarely used parliamentary tactic I expect his ratings to plummet even more. It appears Barack Obama has his earmuffs on and he doesn’t care what the American people think.

Tagged with:
 
Page 1 of 512345