Katrina and the Waves
I purposely shunned the news media this past week, particularly cable news, simply to avoid the incessant caterwauling over Katrina, five years later. Whilst flipping through the channels the other day, even the briefest glimpse of some “news” organization patting itself on the back and replaying its horrifically inaccurate coverage from five years ago caused my eyes to bleed.
Fortunately, I had beer and a Wii handy, so all was soon forgotten. I won’t enumerate every single journalistic misdemeanor and felony perpetrated on the American public in the aftermath of Katrina since W. Joseph Campbell, a professor in Communications at American University, did such a fine job in a recent post at Media Myth Alert.
However, I will say that Katrina may rank as the most overblown natural disaster in the history of mankind, puns and hyperbole very much intended. I’m certainly not downplaying the death and destruction wrought by the hurricane, but I will quibble with the way in which it has been portrayed.
Environmentalists love it because it supposedly represents Mother Nature’s disgust at humankind for having the audacity to drive cars. Race hustlers love it because it supposedly represents how the powerful white establishment could care less about blacks.
What Katrina actually represents is America’s slide into a culture of dependency. We should not be asking how the government can bail us out whenever something goes awry. We should be asking how we can better prepare ourselves so that we don’t need the government’s help.
Moreover, if we should expect any form of competence from government, it should be local and state government, not the Federal government. We are far more likely to be able to hold our local representatives to account than we are some pork-bellied beast thousands of miles away from the action.
Katrina did not expose the failure of the federal government; it exposed the failure of local government to have any semblance of sense before, during and after the storm. The old, tired saw, worn down by constantly sawing through the media’s BS, is that Katrina showed how foolish and inept the Bush administration was.
Even if this were true, it doesn’t change the fact that people need to take responsibility for themselves. Of course that’s an old-fashioned and outdated way of thinking. Also falling out of favor is the notion that we not only help ourselves, but that we help our neighbor when our neighbor is in need. With my boots on the ground, so to speak, I am much more likely to be in a position to help and to do so effectively.
What happens when we cede this responsibility to government is that we tend to care less about our neighbor.”Oh, Uncle Sam’s got his back. I can go back to playing Mario Kart,” we say to ourselves as the flood waters rise.
Today, the average Spaniard is 20 percentage points less likely than the average American to classify himself as “religious,” gives less than half as much to charity, and volunteers about one-fifth as often. And Spain has the highest level of charitable giving per capita in Western Europe (and has church attendance rates that are among the highest as well).
I’ll leave it to you to decide what these statistical variances between the United States and Europe mean and how they relate to the entitlement culture personified by Katrina then and Katrina five years later.
club soda
Club Soda is a penny lover and a recovering liberal. His most unique talent is connecting every topic to communism. As part of his penance for once being a liberal some 15 years or so ago, Club Soda has vowed to read every book by David Horowitz. Unable to escape his past, Club Soda is haunted by the fact that he’s originally from Houston, Texas. Club Soda now resides in Denver and has a chronic illness that requires him to miss a lot of work and ride ski lifts in the winter months.

I agree that it is important to encourage individual accomplishment rather than govt assistance. We have become a nation of spoiled brats without a doubt. So nicely put.
However, your last comment/argument completely falls apart when you consider the topic of universal healthcare. It appears that Spain’s system of providing free coverage to all citizens (with an option for private system) has not interfered with their charitable givings or increase their sense of entitlement that you so often preach will happen in the US. Spain also has much higher personal tax rates than the US. So Spain contradicts the argument that more govt control in the health sector would increase a sense of entitlement in the culture right? Amazing how a country that you glorify for being so charitable and religious also has the one govt run system that so many argue would devastate our sense of individual responsibility.
I will let you decide the correlational inferences between Spain’s morale/charitable reputation and their universal health care system.
Quick note: Spain is on the verge of bankruptcy.
It is fine to argue that we cannot sustain universal health care. However, Club Soda is now barred from ever writing that higher taxes and Obamacare promote a sense of entitlement. Amazing how a country with such high personal responsibility and morale integrity has two things he hates….higher personal taxes (compared to the US) and universal health care. The irony is killing me here!!!
The quote above says the average person in Spain “gives less than half as much to charity” than the average American. It’s worded oddly, but that fits into Club Soda’s argument.
Damn it. I found the article I think he cited and it does fit his argument. Actually, I was pretty impressed with the argument proposed in the article. So thanks for the clarification. My apologies to Mr. Soda.