Fidel Castro and Liberals: A Love Story

On April 19, 2011, in Blogosphere, Politics, by Henshaw

I have written before about the creepy love affair the left has with the murdering racist thug Che Guevara and his enabler Fidel Castro. I can only assume the left’s adoration of Communist Cuba comes from the proverb: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” For those who don’t know, the left is an enemy of the free market; hence, their love affair with thugs, dictators, and tyrants who abhor freedom.

Fidel Castro is in the news today because he apparently “resigned” from office. Well, insomuch that a tyrant resigns. I’m not sure it means anything, but it gives me a chance to highlight some tweets.

so Fidel Castro has resigned today.. you really messed it up during all these years, old man.. CHE will always stay the hero!!!!
@MissHBM
Hiba AJ
Those that are extreme right must remember that not everybody supports American imperialism; Fidel Castro being one of them.
@TonyKerr10
Tony Kerr
#Capitalism is as dangerous to the individual's freedom as #Communism. People just haven't realised it yet.
@TonyKerr10
Tony Kerr
To the elites in Cuba & the US, Che Guevara & Fidel Castro were devils.. But these men lived their lives to uplift their people
@iSpeak92
Socially Conscious

Ah, uplifting the people. It’s really a sad state of affairs when an African-American doesn’t even take the time to research scumbags like Che Guevara. What did Guevara think of black people?

The Negro is indolent and spends his money on frivolities and booze, whereas the European is forward-looking, organized and intelligent.

Is this uplifting? It seems to me that Guevara appreciated the ideas of the elite.

Joseph Goebbels, Call Your Office

On August 10, 2010, in Fascism, Politics, by club soda

I just read at Powerline (a conservative blog) that a movie is being made about Margaret Thatcher. Unfortunately, our open-minded, tolerant friends in Hollywood have apparently decided to make Thatcher in their own image, as an imbecile.

Hollywood has a revolting habit of patting themselves on the back for their “bravery” and “speaking truth to power,” but most of what they churn out is nothing of the sort. It’s more akin to Joseph Goebbels’ role in the Nazi regime.

Hyperbolic? Maybe, but like Goebbels, Hollywood and other “mainstream” pop culture media specialize in character assassinations of those who aren’t on board with their stripe of politics; essentially, anyone to the right of Olympia Snowe.

In the topsy-turvy American leftwing media oxymoronic world, a racist, murdering homophobe is a noble and tragic figure, while the duo that brought the Soviet Union to its knees are soulless buffoons. Maybe it has something to do with Marxism and the left’s religious belief that it will bring “social justice” and Utopia to earth, all the while denying they’re Marxist.

Anyone to the left of Lenin, however, is sure to be the subject of some hagiographic memoir that makes you laugh, cry, sing and cheer (Che Guevara, Harvey Milk, Frida Kahlo, and on and on and on). I know the media’s propaganda has been quite effective, particularly over time as reality morphs with each nail the media pounds into the coffin it’s preparing for certain conservative figures year after year.

For instance, I have conservative friends who tell me that Newt Gingrich is not a viable presidential candidate. They say he’s “damaged goods,” but usually have nothing to back this up other than dredging up Gingrich’s affair. I think my friends’ negativity about Gingrich has more to do with the constant barrage of negative press Gingrich received when he was Speaker of the House, and the implication that if he wasn’t simply a lunatic, then he was “extreme”.

Gingrich was targeted by the media, Alinsky style. The media created a hobgoblin image of him that even conservatives bought into following years of unrelenting negative press. The “news” media use innuendo while the pop media bolster the innuendo with lies and distortions. Today’s news cycle is very predictable: CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, The Washington Post, NPR, etc., etc., yada yada, imply through their reporting that the Tea Party is full of racist homophobes, then the bulk of Law & Order‘s episodes are devoted to bringing the white male Christian serial killer to justice, Jon Stewart devotes half his show to smirkily deriding the Tea Party, Janeane Garofalo prattles on and on about how it’s all about “hating a black man” and so on and so forth until the American public is duped into believing it’s all true.

So, while the news media in the ’80s subtly portrayed Thatcher and Reagan, for instance, as heartless demagogues by placing greater emphasis on certain aspects of society that have always been with us (homelessness), the pop media characterize them as doddering old fools who end up regretting their role as monsters.

Che Guevara: A Murdering Racist Thug

On February 11, 2010, in Politics, by Henshaw

I have never understood the left’s fascination with Che Guevara. Before anyone claims that there’s not a Che obsession, please check out the never ending stream of books, t-shirts, and films about the communist thug. Why does the left idolize a man who was a racist murderer? Big Journalism has a great article about the mainstream press’ indifference to a black Cuban named Eusebio Peñalver who suffered in racist Cuba.

But have you ever heard of Eusebio Peñalver? He became a U.S. citizen and lived in Miami for almost 20 years and would have been a cinch for the media to track down. Ever see a CNN interview with him? Ever see him on 60 Minutes? Ever read about him in the New York Times? The Washington Post? The Boston Globe? Ever hear the NAACP or the Congressional Black Caucus mention him?

It’s odd that the left, which prides itself as being a super-tolerant and racist-free bunch, continues to idolize a man who is on record for saying, “The Negro is indolent and spends his money on frivolities and booze, whereas the European is forward-looking, organized and intelligent.” Is Steven Soderbergh going to write, film, and direct a four-hour movie about Nathan Bedford Forrest (it would likely be a far more interesting film)? Or are Soderbergh glory films about racists only reserved for militant murdering socialists? Heck, there has even been a movie for the thug’s early years. It was called The Motorcycle Diaries, but it might as well have been called “How the Americans Made Che Angry.”

Even when liberals finally admit their hero was a murderer and a racist they can fall back on the heartwarming belief that it was really just the United States’ fault. I guess that’s all that really matters.

Tagged with: