Somehow I missed this, but the Wall Street Journal had an op-ed on natural gas on Monday. Amy Myers Jaffe makes a few of the same points I made yesterday, but she also adds a few more. Jaffe argues that increased use of natural gas will make it easier to subsidize sustainable sources and will have a positive impact on geopolitics.

Not only will the shale discoveries prevent a cartel from forming, but the petro-states will lose lots of the muscle they now have in world affairs, as customers over time cut them loose and turn to cheap fuel produced closer to home.

The shale boom also is likely to upend the economics of renewable energy. It may be a lot harder to persuade people to adopt green power that needs heavy subsidies when there’s a cheap, plentiful fuel out there that’s a lot cleaner than coal, even if gas isn’t as politically popular as wind or solar.

It’s a good article and well worth reading. I have a small issue with her assertion about our trade deficit. There’s too much hand-wringing about that statistic, but in terms of energy sources it would be wise to produce much of our own natural gas.