<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Daily Plunge &#187; Geopolitics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyplunge.com/tag/geopolitics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyplunge.com</link>
	<description>Plunging Towards Gomorrah</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.dailyplunge.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>RE: Natural Gas</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyplunge.com/2010/05/re-natuaral-gas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailyplunge.com/2010/05/re-natuaral-gas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 21:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Myers Jaffe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyplunge.com/?p=3203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow I missed this, but the Wall Street Journal had an op-ed on natural gas on Monday. Amy Myers Jaffe makes a few of the same points I made yesterday, but she also adds a few more. Jaffe argues that increased use of natural gas will make it easier to subsidize sustainable sources and will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I missed this, but the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> had an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303491304575187880596301668.html">op-ed </a>on natural gas on Monday. Amy Myers Jaffe makes a few of the same points I made <a href="http://www.dailyplunge.com/2010/05/its-time-for-natural-gas/">yesterday</a>, but she also adds a few more. Jaffe argues that increased use of natural gas will make it easier to subsidize sustainable sources and will have a positive impact on geopolitics.</p>
<blockquote><p>Not only will the shale discoveries prevent a cartel from forming, but the petro-states will lose lots of the muscle they now have in world affairs, as customers over time cut them loose and turn to cheap fuel produced closer to home.</p>
<p>The shale boom also is likely to upend the economics of renewable energy. It may be a lot harder to persuade people to adopt green power that needs heavy subsidies when there&#8217;s a cheap, plentiful fuel out there that&#8217;s a lot cleaner than coal, even if gas isn&#8217;t as politically popular as wind or solar.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a good article and well worth reading. I have a small issue with her assertion about our trade deficit. There&#8217;s too much hand-wringing about that statistic, but in terms of energy sources it would be wise to produce much of our own natural gas.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyplunge.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/EY-AA344E_CHEAPGAS.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3204" title="Natural Gas" src="http://www.dailyplunge.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/EY-AA344E_CHEAPGAS.jpg" alt="" width="492" height="511" /></a> </p>
<g:plusone href="http://www.dailyplunge.com/2010/05/re-natuaral-gas/"  size="small"   annotation="none"  ></g:plusone>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailyplunge.com/2010/05/re-natuaral-gas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

