Fake but Accurate Emails

On June 10, 2010, in Blogosphere, Fun With Email, by Henshaw

One of my big pet peeves is moronic chain letters. I think people are starting to catch on, but it’s still a problem. These days it’s not difficult to fact check an email via Snopes. Heck, just Google it. Ignorance really isn’t an excuse anymore. It’s just lazy.

This morning I received an email from John Smith. I knew there was a problem when I saw the email was an AOL account. My first internet experience was thanks to AOL. For $20 you could get 20 hours a month. I’m not sure that would last a week now. The fact is that was 1996. There’s a good chance if someone is still using AOL they might not be technologically inclined.

John Smith is worried that President Obama is going to take guns away. Obviously, he’s not the only one. That’s why an email like the one below is so “believable.”

Subject: WARNING….

While you were watching the oil spill, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN. This is one of the things Sheriff Mack has been telling people about. OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT.

That’s just the first three sentences of this fabricated story. Click here to read the entire email. A simple search yields this entry on Snopes. Shockingly, this rumor is false. There is no “legal” way around Constitutional amendments. Plus, the Secretary of State can’t ratify a treaty; that’s the job of Congress.

I don't think we have to worry about President Obama taking guns.

This type of political delusion ties back into my post about The Political Blame Game. There are plenty of areas to complain about the government. When people choose to believe stupid stuff like this and then forward to everyone they know via email they look like fools. It also weakens any arguments they may have against the subject being Urban Legended (I just coined a new word: “You’ve been Urban Legended, homey.”).

As if all the stars had aligned in the universe the Balloon Boy story from yesterday has landed on the desk of The Daily Plunge. How is that you may ask? Obviously stories like this are normally not my cup of tea, but that’s until I saw this video of the Balloon Boy’s Dad:

I had the video posted here but it’s causing my site problems on IE8. Thank you Microsoft.

Hillary Clinton is a shapeshifting reptilian? Fire up the grid, the loonies are out in full force. I wonder how many people actually believe this stuff? It must be more than I initially thought.

the world loves us again

On February 18, 2009, in Politics, by Henshaw

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton received a warm welcome in Indonesia. I guess these people haven’t been swept away in the “change” euphoria that’s all the rage in the USA.
Warm Welcome

What Did We Do to Deserve This?

On October 9, 2007, in Politics, by Henshaw

Hillary Campaign ButtonThe 2008 election is shaping up to be one of the most boring in recent memory, if the conventional wisdom stays true to form. The Republican Party is a mess. They have no direction, an unpopular president in the White House, and no one to communicate any new ideas. It’s all low taxes, smaller government, Ronald Reagan, and no specifics. There’s no ambition and no big ideas. We have a bloated government that most American’s want downsized, but the Republicans never do anything about it.

The entire government could be run more efficiently, and several departments could be downsized or removed all together. Ron Paul advocates removing the Department of Agriculture. Yeah, that’s a pretty crazy idea, but do we really need it? Is the United States and agriculture country anymore, the answer is no. Unfortunately once a department gets created it never goes away. So we spend trillions on things we don’t need. What about the tax code? Everyone agrees it’s terrible. Republicans have been talking about changing it forever, but we’ve got nothing to show for it.

The Democrats don’t have anything to offer either; however, they’re the alternative. Not being a Republican is going to be good enough to win. Every day I’m more and more convinced that Hillary Clinton is going to be the next President. Which is astonishing considering the complaints about Bush. For Americans tired of corruption and scandal it’s difficult to believe that the wife of one of the most scandal ridden presidential administrations in the history of the country will offer a real change.

Hillary Clinton has been consolidating power with the Democrat Party for over a decade. She would enter the White House during one of the most pessimistic times in recent history. Senator Clinton would also be one of the most divisive Presidents every elected. Despite all of those factors she will likely be the next President. That’s if the conventional wisdom is true. It would be a huge upset if another Democrat gets the nomination. Has our political process really come to this? There’s less than thirteen months to find out.

Tagged with:
 

Handicapping the Field

On August 20, 2007, in Politics, by Henshaw

The 2008 presidential election is just a little over a year away. Things are finally starting to take shape. I don’t really have a dog in this fight. None of the candidates have done anything to get me excited. Let’s look at the Democrat side first.

Hillary Clinton
Hillary ClintonSenator Clinton is the front runner for the nomination. She has the money, name recognition, and policy experience. There’s perhaps no savvier politician in the race. Since 1999 her life has been spent preparing for this race. Clinton’s connections in the Democrat party shouldn’t be underestimated, and it’s difficult seeing anyone else denying her an opportunity to secure the nomination. In the primary she’s running as the most presidential and electable candidate. Hillary isn’t a fantastic speaker but she knows her stuff. She has high unfavorable ratings, but in a general election anything is possible. It’s difficult to pick a winner this far out but I have to think she’s likely the next President of the United States.

Barack “Mr. Cellophane” Obama
Barak ObamaThe Illinois Senator has had a rough few months. The debates against Hillary haven’t gone well. Obama’s weakness is inexperience. Hillary has exposed that during the debates and he’s reinforced it with some of his comments on foreign policy. Obama represented the fresh face (much like Edwards in 2004), but he’s too far to the Left to win a general election. This “electability” factor is ultimately what ended Howard Dean’s hopes in 2004 and is what is going against Obama. Given his widespread appeal it’s difficult to believe he would be tipped to be VP on a Clinton ticket.
On the Democrat side that’s basically it. John Edwards has really lost the plot recently. He’s been in a media war with Ann Coulter and has basically (at least in perception) dropped to her level. It’s strange, I once thought Edwards had a real shot at being President, but his high water mark was before the 2004 convention. There are still many Democrats that would vote for Al Gore, but time is running out. It’s perhaps already too late for another candidate to come into the race this late and contend against the Clinton juggernaut.

Republicans
The Republicans are lost at the moment. There’s no clear front runner. The field is wide open. This can best be seen in the amount of money raised by the candidates. Republicans just aren’t excited about the current crop of contenders. It’s sort of amazing that the President never lined up some kind of successor. Eisenhower had Nixon, Reagan had Bush, and Clinton had Gore. Unless something drastic happens over the next six months Bush’s role in selecting a Republican nominee will diminish. Given his current popularity that might be a good thing for Republicans.

Rudy Giuliani
Rudy GiulianiThe former mayor of New York City is the closest thing to a front runner on the Republican side of things. It would be an interesting twist in history. In 2000 he was slated to run against Hillary Clinton for the New York Senate seat. After being diagnosed with cancer (among other messy personal issues) Giuliani withdrew his candidacy. Hillary went on to win the seat and Rudy went on to become Time’s Person of the Year after 9/11. His popularity since that event has propelled him toward the Republican nomination despite being socially liberal on several issues. In any other year his views on topics like abortion would be debilitating, but this isn’t any ordinary election. Giuliani is a great speaker, his speech at the 2004 Republican convention was the most memorable moment of the event. After eight years of divisiveness it’s difficult seeing the Left warm up to Rudy. I’m not sure the country is ready for that.

Mitt Romney
Mitt RomneyI really don’t know what to think of the former Governor of Massachusetts. His Dad George W. Romney ran unsuccessfully for president in 1968 when Nixon secured the Republican nomination. Much has been made of the fact that he’s Mormon. Some of the national polls regarding voting for someone of Mormon faith have been shocking. It appears that there’s more reluctance on the part of Americans to vote for a Mormon than for a woman or African American. Perhaps these polls are inaccurate, but it’s still a perception going again Romney. The fact that he’s flip-flopped on many issues is disconcerting as well. Flip-flopping dogged the Kerry campaign and is hurting Romney as well.

John McCain

John McCainFor a long time McCain has been viewed as the strongest Republican candidate. After the immigration bill fiasco it’s plausible that McCain isn’t even a serious challenger. It’s an amazing turn of events for someone who has been the center of Presidential speculation the past eight years. The Senator from Arizona has never been a hero to conservatives, even though at this point he’s likely the most conservative candidate left. I think it’s too early to write him off entirely, but it’s going to be an uphill climb from here.

Fred Thompson
Fred ThompsonWhat is going on with this guy? Is he running or not running? The former Senator from Tennessee has been teasing Republicans for months now and the act may be getting old. It appears he’ll announce sometime in September, but has he missed an opportunity to cash in when the buzz was at its peak? Thompson still remains somewhat of an unknown at this point. He hasn’t been in any debates and remained on the outside of the process. He’s promised an unconventional campaign, but it remains to be seen whether or not that will help his cause.

Unlike the Democrat side there’s still a lot of money up for grabs. This makes it easier for someone to come in later in the process and mount a serious challenge. Thompson could be part of the reason Republican donors are holding onto their money. There are several other less known candidates that might come out of nowhere. Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee is one example. Right now I have no feel for what is happening on the Republican side. If I had to pick someone right now it would have to be Rudy, but I’m just guessing. The next 15 months should be fun.