The Price of Change

On February 27, 2010, in Politics, by Henshaw

The Obama administration has been a godsend for unions. The Economist has an article about unions that sheds light on the type of job creation Obama intends to inflict on the nation. Obama and his socialist union allies would like to create 4 million union jobs. Why not? More union members equals more democrat voters? Why should Americans care? Well, unions cost more, do less, and do it worse than the private sector.

His [Obama] biggest favour has been green, foldable and borrowed. For example, he encourages the use of “Project Labour Agreements” on big federal construction projects, whereby contractors must recruit through a union hiring hall. Such agreements inflate costs by 12-18%, according to David Tuerck of Suffolk University, and were banned under Mr Bush. Even where PLAs are not in force, federal contractors are obliged to pay “prevailing” wages. That actually means something close to the union rates, which is nice for the workers in question but means that taxpayers get fewer roads and schools for their money.

Do prices even matter the way Obama is spending money? Unions are certainly less influential in the U.S. than in Europe. That’s a good thing; however, more than half of union members currently work for the government. Is it really surprising that unions support the party of state control? Is it surprising that Mr. Transparency is scratching the back of the Democrat voting bloc?

Increasing the strength and numbers of unions is not a good idea. Look at the problems in Greece. Look at the how the teachers unions in the United States are damaging eduction. There’s a growing movement among the crazy anti-Walmart crowd to unionize the place. Such a move would simply bleed the company dry and another company would take its place. I guess as long as Target and IKEA aren’t effected no one will mind.

Tagged with:
 

ikea comes to tampa

On May 11, 2009, in Miscellaneous, by Henshaw

I’m getting married in a few weeks and my fiancée and I have a new place to fill up with furniture. We’ll be moving in together after the wedding, but we pretty much have an empty place in which to decorate. Fortunately for us Ikea just opened a store in Tampa. Ikea is the perfect place for yuppies like ourselves.
IKEA
The store opened up last Wednesday and we finally made it on Saturday. Despite the fact the store was packed full of people it was fairly easy to maneuver through the aisles. The economy slowing down has affected everyone to a certain degree (myself included) but it’s difficult to feel too sorry for myself when I see all the shopping options that are available. I guess I’m not the only one; people camped out for days in front of the store in anticipation of the grand opening.

They slept on concrete, urban campers motivated by free chairs with a name few could pronounce and the possibility of a $250 gift card to their favorite electric blue and yellow furniture store.
It’s here! Finally here! Ikea!
“This store, it’s a way of life,” said Patti Flippo, resting in a camping chair next to her tent Tuesday morning. She and roommate Courtney Stone came from their apartment in Riverview two days before this morning’s grand opening.

I don’t think I’d go as far as to say the place is a way of life. That sounds a little too much like the Ikea Nesting Instinct

Isn’t it amazing when white people love corporations? This reminds me of #82 of Stuff White People Like. #82 is about how white people hate corporations, especially Wal-Mart. However, there are always exceptions to the rule…

When engaging in a conversation about corporate evils it is important to NEVER, EVER mention Apple Computers, Target or Ikea in the same breath as the companies mentioned earlier. White people prefer to hate corporations that don’t make stuff that they like.

Tagged with:
 

IKEA Shoppers of the World Unite

On August 23, 2006, in Politics, by Henshaw

true evilI thought Democrats were the party of the average guy? Here is a newsflash; Wal-Mart is the average guy’s store. It’s has everything that middle-class families need. Sure their stores can be dirty and you might have to fight for the last loaf of bread with some elderly midget with tourettes syndrome, but Wal-Mart’s prices are the best out there. It’s no surprise that 80% of people who have never shopped at Wal-Mart voted for John Kerry in the last election. These people file into IKEA stores and shop at Nordstrom’s and discuss how horrible it is to see the filthy peasants lined up outside the local Wal-Quaeda. What is this disease that makes people think things are always horrible? When the LA Times runs an editorial discussing how crazy this topic is, it’s time for a reality check.

One reason the Democrats may have a tin ear on this subject is demographic. Certainly most of the party’s urban liberal activists are far removed from the Wal-Mart phenomenon. The retailer has thrived mainly in small towns and exurbs, which is one reason a Zogby poll found that three-quarters of weekly Wal-Mart shoppers voted for President Bush in 2004, and why 8 out of 10 people who have never shopped at Wal-Mart voted for John Kerry. Denouncing the retailer may make sense if the goal is to woo primary activists, but it’s a disastrous way to reach out to the general electorate.

Tagged with: