Bush Nostalgia Syndrome

On August 19, 2011, in Politics, by Henshaw

Liberals are in full smear mode against presidential hopeful Rick Perry. In the last 24 hours The Daily Beast gets special recognition for running articles titled “A Christian Plot for Domination?” and “Perry: King of the Know-Nothings.” Progressives are known for their faux intellectualism and their condescension, but this is taking it to the next level.

Michelle Goldberg’s Christianphobic article is written under the premise that Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann believe that Christians have a God-given right to rule all earthly institutions. It’s perhaps the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Where was Goldberg’s outrage about Obama’s 20-year personal relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright? What does she think about “black liberation theology?” We’ll never know, because she’s a hack. One might want to casually dismiss something as idiotic as this, but Goldberg is a senior contributing writer for Newsweek/The Daily Beast.

Michael Tomasky is dismayed by Rick Perry’s opinions about global warming. Tomasky is apparently unaware that Perry’s views are mirrored by most Americans. Liberals seem to be caught by surprise that the theory of man-made global warming is going up in smoke. Oh, but there’s more…

Nearly every day has brought forth a new gem. On Thursday, he told a New Hampshire school-age child that he’s “not sure anybody actually knows completely and absolutely” how old the Earth is. He preceded these with a remark about Barack Obama not being respected by the military. And, of course, there was the infamous statement that Ben Bernanke would be committing “treason” by priming the economy. Not bad—nail the black guy and the Jew in your very first week on the trail!

Oh no! Perry doesn’t know the exact ago of the Earth! It’s believed that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. I bet if we asked a room of intelligent people the majority wouldn’t know the answer and I’m not sure that anyone knows the exact age. Perry’s statement about Bernanke is so “infamous” that Tomasky can’t even get the context correct. He goes further by bring race into the equation. It makes you wonder who the real racists are in this country.

Both articles share Bush Nostalgia Syndrome in common. For those who are not familiar with BNS it works like this: all former GOP presidents are more sane/smart than the next GOP presidents. After eight years of Bush-Hitler, now liberals like Goldberg say “with Tim Pawlenty out of the presidential race, it is now fairly clear that the GOP candidate will either be Mitt Romney or someone who makes George W. Bush look like Tom Paine.” The template is always the same. Liberals thought Bush was a simpleton. They thought Reagan was an old idiot who couldn’t remember anything. The pattern of liberal condescension towards the right is endless.

It’s obvious that liberals have completely lost touch with mainstream Americans. The Vice President calls his opponents terrorists and the President of the United States attended a church for two decades that preached that the United States’ “chickens came home to roost” on 9/11. The real extremists aren’t hard to find. They’re in the White House.

Liberal Condescension: Twitter Style

On June 20, 2010, in Blogosphere, by Henshaw

It’s been awhile since I’ve written about Twitterspace, but every once in awhile I run into some crazy liberals there. Today I was just minding my own business, watching the Braves play and following the #Braves hashtag on Twitter. That’s when I ran into this guy. KCYeti is another member of the not-so-kind-and-gentle progressive left. I should add that his Twitter feed isn’t exactly family friendly. Here’s his take on Braves fans:

I know, I know, I’m picking on one guy in Kansas and frankly he’s had worse things to say about the Twins. This is just another example of a faux enlightened individual who cloaks his disgusting personality under the guise of progressive political superiority. This is what happens to people when they spend their free time reading The Daily Kos. That type of leftest fringe thought process makes anything easy to believe. It’s easy to pick on Atlanta Braves fans when you believe they’re all inferior racist tea party nutjobs. Just imagine if I ran across this guy and the topic was the Astros or Rangers! Hitler analogies, here we come!

It’s one thing when some Manhattan snob looks down at the South, but as I mentioned earlier Kirk Harris is from Kansas (not that there’s anything wrong with that). Who knew that Kansas was the new bastion of elite philosophical political thought? Then again, maybe it’s not. How stupid do you have to be to Tweet about the Braves anyway?

Unintelligent Debate

On March 28, 2010, in Politics, by Henshaw

Whatever happened to intelligent debate? There seems like there’s less and less of it these days. Debating the common man has become almost pointless. Who has time to cut through the talking points, misconceptions, myths, and partisanship anymore? We live in the information age, but too many people have crawled into their caves.

Research suggests that conservatives are more likely to read “opposing views” than their liberal counterparts. Perhaps this is the reason liberals have such a difficult time understanding the arguments of conservatives. It’s just much easier to call conservatives names. The left’s angle on the tea party movement is very clear. Brand the entire group as mindless racists even though a majority of Americans are opposed to ObamaCare. Last week when Congressman Emanuel Cleaver claimed he was spit on and called names there was no evidence to support the claim. Even though there were thousands of people around and his staff was holding up phones to record everything that was going on (a point I’ve seen no one in the press make). What does it say about a political ideology and its supporters when instead of defending ObamaCare they’d rather call their opponents racists?

Four administrators of the “I bet we can find 10,000,000 people who think Sarah Palin is an idiot” group on Facebook go to Stanford. Is this how they practice intelligent debate at that prestigious university? Why is okay to dress up as a vagina at a Palin event, but it’s radical to oppose ObamaCare? For the hipster dufus, protesting anyone who is a Republican is cool. Getting your news from The Daily Show is cool. Plus, calling the opposition stupid is encouraged. Remember the left also hated and looked down at Ronald Reagan. Certainly 1/6th of the people who voted for the most unqualified person ever to become president might think Sarah Palin is an idiot. They have to do something to “feel good” about themselves.

Four six years the United States had a very vocal anti-war movement that was full of radicals and hate speech. The examples of radical behavior were a lot clearer back then, except I never heard about it on TV. I don’t remember the Democratic leadership calling for the crowds to “tone it down.” Now one Congressman yells fire in a crowded room and I’m supposed to believe him? If we’ve learned anything during this reform process it’s that the Democrats will lie to advance their agenda.

For an idea of how shallow these people are just read this column by Courtland Miloy that was published in the Washington Post:

I know how the “tea party” people feel, the anger, venom and bile that many of them showed during the recent House vote on health-care reform. I know because I want to spit on them, take one of their “Obama Plan White Slavery” signs and knock every racist and homophobic tooth out of their Cro-Magnon heads. I am sick of these people — and those who make excuses for them and their victim-whiner mentality.

How’s that for constructive dialogue about an alleged incident? Racism is a serious issue in this nation but why aren’t people like Courtland Milloy, Emanuel Cleaver, and Randall Robinson called out for making incendiary claims that are untrue? Are wolf attack victims allowed to cry wolf because they’ve been attacked in the past? What I’d love to hear from the wise minds on the left are some logical arguments. Branding the opposition with lies is a bit totalitarian for my taste and a certain sign they’re losing the debate.

Twitter Agitators

On February 19, 2010, in Blogosphere, by Henshaw

Over the last six months I’ve really enjoyed using Twitter. At first I didn’t see a real use for the platform, but now I’m not sure I can live without it. For breaking news and politics Twitter is essential. There is also a lot of riff raff to deal with. This really isn’t a indictment of “progressives” because I’m one person and I can’t really generalize a whole ideology based on a few bad apples, but lately I’ve run into some really partisan hacks.

Now on to the tweet of the day. As I mentioned a few days ago @top20reos has been a real joy to read the past few days. I pointed this fact out today and someone rallied to his defense. After a few exchanges (none, of which were logical) here’s the classic tweet from @ilovemytroops.

ilovemytroops

Actually, I don’t know who exactly I was talking to, but if her website is any indication it wasn’t anyone who was well respected. The liberal condescension here is amazing. I’m a fool and inferior? I tried four or five times to get a direct answer from this person, but all I got was random name calling and comments about Sarah Palin. What is it about Sarah Palin that is driving some of those on the left to derangement. I just don’t get it.