Reading uninformed tweets on Twitter never gets old, so I decided to check out the liberals’ take on the debt ceiling debate. I’m not surprised that they believe the real problem is rich people…

TheDailyEdge: #GOP Says Debt Ceiling Vote Must Be Tied to Cutting #Medicare, Because Taxing the Rich Would Be "Too Easy" #p2 #news
@as_promised
S G Hastey

Well, taxing the rich wouldn’t work. Even if we increased taxes on the rich by 100% it wouldn’t solve our debt problems. S G Hastey’s bio on twitter reads,”If you haven’t figured out yet that the GOP is a perverse combination of Christianity and wealth, you’ve got catching up to do.” I guess he doesn’t know that two-thirds of people making over $30 million a year voted for Obama in the last election. Oh well, facts are overrated. It’s just easier to live with tribal knowledge.

Debt ceiling has been raised 72 times (10 in the last decade) but GOP will do ANYTHING to spite this Black man. @ @ #P2 #P2b

Who is obsessed with race? Liberals or conservatives? The left doesn’t really have an argument in favor of raising the debt ceiling. No, it’s simpler than that. To oppose raising the debt ceiling means you’re either an evil rich Christian, a racist, or both.

Two wars, ABSURD tax cuts for the very rich, and then a vote against raising the debt ceiling until the poor are further squeezed? SHAME!#fb
@tomoconnor
Tom O'Connor

Voting against the debt ceiling is a vote against the poor? How does this work? The real shame is that the entire nation will be poor if these idiots get their way. It’s an odd time in politics. What exactly do these people think is going to happen if we don’t do something? They’re stuck inside their own political echo chamber. Hating Paul Ryan isn’t going to save the day. Raising taxes on the rich isn’t the answer. Liberals, what’s your grand idea? It’s time to get over Liberal Denial Syndrome. Admit there’s a problem.

avon calling… to destroy america!

On June 25, 2009, in Global Warming, Politics, by club soda

Send in the ClownsJohn Edwards was right. There are two Americas. The problem is that those two Americas make up the constituency of his party. The very rich are attracted to the Democratic Party because they’re able to “do something” to help others without lifting a finger themselves. Plus, their wealth insulates them from the consequences “progressive” policies have on the average American.
The poor, meanwhile, become dependent on the government, which is the way government and the aristocracy prefers it. It helps ensure the perpetual power and wealth of those in power as the rest of us are forced into dependency by the policies of the powerful.
I happened across a Q&A in USA Today with Andrea Jung, Avon’s CEO. As you may already know, Avon sells cosmetics. But more importantly, Jung is a big supporter of “change”, particularly since the consequences of change are unlikely to affect her since she’s taken home about $36 million over the past five years.
“Without being a political pundit, each one of us has come into a leadership role knows that the first 100 days will be looked at. President Obama’s 100-day plan is pretty impressive. I think it’s a Wow 100-plus days. The administration is not operating from fear, it is trying to drive change for the future, and that’s a good thing,” Jung said.
Good lord. Jung’s missive about the first 100 days totally misses the mark. What the hell is a “Wow 100-plus days” anyway? You mean ramming trillions of dollars in unnecessary spending down our throats without giving anyone a chance to read the 500-lb. bill? You mean the litany of tax cheats and other ethically-challenged people Obama tried to foist on our system?
Then she has the nerve to say “the administration is not operating from fear…” Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel said it best: “You never want a serious crisis go to waste.” It is obvious the administration was operating from fear, and playing on the fears of the American people in order to implement its left-wing agenda.
Given this foolishness (and the response to her foolishness could fill volumes), how can you possibly trust anything else she says, whether it’s about politics or business? But again, Jung represents the new narcissistic aristocracy in America. When cap-and-trade and a new health care program goes down, Jung’s millions will shield her from the consequences.
When energy prices double and triple all in the name of reversing mythical, magical “global warming” (now called “climate change”) through cap-and-trade, Jung will continue to jet around the world, burning petrol like no tomorrow. Meanwhile, everyone else better figure out how to squeeze into those freaking clown cars, or add another two hours to their commute as they mount their bike for the 20-mile ride downtown. It’ll be like China, but without good Chinese food!
But it’s all worth it… this change that Jung is helping foster through her support. We’re all going to have to make adjustments. Well, maybe Jung won’t have to make any adjustments. I very much doubt that Jung will face the same health care system enjoyed by the average American. There will be no rationing, no interminable waiting lists, and no being subject to the whims of a faceless bureaucracy for Jung.
In Jung’s brave new world, everyone else must pay the penalty to make her feel good about “doing something”. Jung gave $30,800 to Obama’s campaign in 2008. Something tells me that if you can throw around $30,000 you’ll probably do just fine when the inflation, high interest rates, skyrocketing costs of fuel and health care, and all the other you-know-what hits the fan when the Obama administration’s runaway spending starts to pay dividends.

The Rich vs. the Super Rich

On October 21, 2008, in Politics, by Henshaw

It’s a typical stereotype that Republicans are rich tycoons. Well, according to the Wall Street Journal it’s not quite that simple.

More than three quarters of those worth $1 million to $10 million plan to vote for Sen. McCain. Only 15% plan to vote for Sen. Obama (the rest are undecided). Of those worth more than $30 million, two-thirds support Sen. Obama, while one third support Sen. McCain.

This makes perfect sense to me. The Super Rich are beyond the touch of the government. They’re less inclined to care about how tax policy will effect their employees. The people in the lower brackets are in charge of smaller companies and their businesses will be more adversely effected by Obama’s tax plan.

Tagged with: